Sugerencias
Idioma
Información de la revista
Cita
Cita
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
397
Review
Acceso a texto completo
Disponible online el 24 de junio de 2026

Safety of excipients in pediatric medications: impact on child health

Seguridad de los excipientes en medicamentos pediátricos: impacto en la salud infantil
Visitas
397
Leonel Silva-Chocoteco, Monserratt Abud-González, Cesar Ricardo Cortez-Álvarez, Nicte Selene Fajardo-Robledo
Autor para correspondencia
nicte.fajardo@academicos.udg.mx

Corresponding author.
Departamento de Farmacobiología, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
Contenido relacionado
Leonel Silva-Chocoteco, Monserratt Abud-González, Cesar Ricardo Cortez-Álvarez, Nicte Selene Fajardo-Robledo
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
f0005
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Analysis of studies about common diluting and tensioactive agents and their associated adverse events in pediatric patients.
Tablas
Table 2. Summary of the most relevant preservatives and antioxidants and associated adverse effects in pediatric patients.
Tablas
Table 3. A review of studies on relevant sweeteners and colorants for their adverse events in pediatric patients.
Tablas
Table 4. Summary of studies on excipients with reported toxicity in pediatrics.
Tablas
Abstract
Objective

Excipients, the inactive components of medications, are essential in pharmaceutical formulations, but their safety in the pediatric population is not always guaranteed. Children, due to their physiological and metabolic immaturity, are more susceptible to the adverse effects of these additives. This study aimed to review the safety of the most common excipients in pediatric medicines, highlighting their risks and documented mechanisms of toxicity.

Method

A systematic review was conducted following the guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including studies published between 2014 and 2025. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, along with regulations from key international and national regulatory agencies.

Results

Fifty-four excipients with potential toxicity in children were identified and classified into four functional groups. Notable adverse effects include hepatic, renal, and neurological toxicity, as well as hypersensitivity reactions. A significant limitation is the lack of specific data for the pediatric population.

Conclusion

exposure to excipients in children is an underestimated clinical problem, exacerbated by the frequent use of formulations adapted from adults. The discussion addresses regulatory disparities, the critical need to develop medicines specifically designed for children, and the importance of collaborative initiatives to build pediatric safety databases. The pharmacist plays a key role in the informed selection of excipients. The findings indicate that a considerable proportion of excipients used in pediatric formulations carry documented toxicological risks, especially in younger age groups. This review underscores the urgent need for more rigorous safety evaluation, the development of age-specific formulations, and greater transparency in information for healthcare professionals.

Keywords:
Excipients
Pediatrics
Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
Pharmaceutical preparations
Drug toxicity
Drug compounding
Resumen
Objetivo

los excipientes, componentes inactivos de los medicamentos, son esenciales en las formulaciones farmacéuticas, pero su seguridad en la población pediátrica no siempre está garantizada. Los niños, debido a su inmadurez fisiológica y metabólica, son más susceptibles a los efectos adversos de estos aditivos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue revisar la seguridad de los excipientes más comunes en medicamentos pediátricos, destacando sus riesgos y mecanismos de toxicidad documentados.

Método

se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices para revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, incluyendo estudios publicados entre 2014 y 2025, en las bases de datos PubMed, Web of Science y ScienceDirect, así como normativas de agencias reguladoras internacionales y nacionales.

Resultados

se identificaron 54 excipientes con potencial de toxicidad en niños, clasificados en 4 grupos funcionales. Se destacan efectos adversos como toxicidad hepática, renal, neurológica y reacciones de hipersensibilidad. La principal limitación es la falta de datos específicos para la pediatría.

Conclusiones

la exposición a excipientes en niños es un problema clínico subestimado, agravado por el uso frecuente de formulaciones adaptadas de adultos. Se discute la disparidad regulatoria, la necesidad crítica de desarrollar medicamentos específicamente diseñados para niños y la importancia de iniciativas colaborativas para generar bases de datos de seguridad pediátrica. El farmacéutico desempeña un rol clave en la selección informada de excipientes. los hallazgos muestran que una proporción considerable de excipientes en formulaciones pediátricas conlleva riesgos toxicológicos documentados, especialmente en los grupos de menor edad. Esta revisión subraya la urgente necesidad de una evaluación más rigurosa, el desarrollo de formulaciones pediátricas específicas y una mayor transparencia en la información dirigida a los profesionales de la salud.

Palabras clave:
Excipientes
Pediatría
Efectos colaterales y reacciones adversas relacionados con medicamentos
Preparaciones farmacéuticas
Toxicidad de medicamentos
Formulación de medicamentos
Texto completo
Introduction

A pharmaceutical product is composed of two key elements: the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the excipient. As many as 93% of medications contain excipients, which are essential to the vast majority of compounds.1 Mexican laws define an excipient or additive as a substance added to improve the efficacy, safety, stability, appearance or acceptability of a medication.2

Currently, over 1000 excipients are used in more than 40 drug classes, ranging from simple substances to complex compounds. However, increasingly complex excipients are emerging as a result of advances in drug administration systems. In this scenario, the question arises whether excipients actually are inactive substances.3

The lack of commercially available drugs for pediatric patients is overcome through the preparation of compounded medications, where the pharmacist plays a key role in excipient selection. Additives that are safe for adults may not be so for children, thereby requiring thorough case-by-case evaluation.4 Drug metabolism in children may vary as a result of physiological immaturity.5 In recent years, increasing attention is being paid to the potential adverse events of excipients in pediatric patients. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) underlines the importance of providing a comprehensive development rationale, taking into consideration the relative benefits and the risks of possible alternatives.6

A study was conducted to expand our understanding of excipients and establish a conceptual framework that guides excipient choice by pharmaceutical development professionals. In many cases, the use of certain excipients may be avoided by optimizing manufacturing processes, without compromising product quality or pediatric patient safety. The ultimate purpose is to provide pharmacy professionals with essential information that guides informed decision-making on the use of excipients in pharmaceutical formulations.

Methods

A systematic literature search of relevant studies was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-A guidelines.7

Eligibility criteria

A literature search was conducted of original articles, reviews and case reports addressing the safety of excipients in medicinal products for pediatric patients published between 2014 and 2025 available in English or Spanish. Study eligibility was based on the following criteria:

Inclusion criteria: (i) studies describing adverse events associated with drug excipients, along with the doses causing such AEs; (ii) studies that account for the toxicologic and pharmacokinetic mechanisms that lead to such AEs.

The following exclusion criteria were applied: (i) publications not primarily focused on pediatric patient safety; (ii) studies reporting toxicological effects associated with food rather than drug exposure; (iii) studies conducted in adult populations; (iv) articles not published in English or Spanish; and (v) studies without available full text.

Information sources

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases, complemented by searches of regulatory agency websites, including those of the European Medicines Agency (EMA),6,8 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),9 the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS),10 and the Madrid Health System (SERMAS).11 The search strategy included terms such as “excipients”, “pediatric”, “children”, “toxicity” and “safety”, along with the names and synonyms of known excipients, in combination with Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”. Additionally, 31 studies were retrieved from gray literature not indexed in the databases detailed above.

Selection process

Two reviewers separately performed an evaluation of all titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible studies. Subsequently, the two reviewers carried out full-text reading for appropriateness.

Variables

Information was collected on each excipient regarding their general use, toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, as well as the dosage regimens recommended by the main regulatory agencies.

Results

A total of 696 references were reviewed, of which 98 were considered to be eligible. Fig. 1 describes the literature selection process according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 85 (86.7%) papers have been published in the last decade, 62 (63.3%) in the last 5 years, and 13 (13,3%) were published more than 10 years ago.

Figure 1.

Literature selection process.

Finally, 54 excipients were categorized into four groups: diluents and tensioactive agents (8); preservatives and antioxidants (14); colorants and flavoring agents (16); and other excipients (16). Although an additive may have different functions, they were classified into four groups for organizational purposes. However, other functions are detailed in related tables. A detailed description of excipient safety is provided below by excipient class.

Diluents and tensioactive agents

Around 40% of dispensed medications and 90% of newly discovered therapeutic compounds exhibit poor solubility in aqueous environments.12 This limitation is overcome through the use of co-diluents and tensioactive agents.5 The potential documented mechanisms of toxicity of some of the excipients in this category are explained in the following section:

Ethanol

Ethanol is a widely used excipient primarily used in oral, topic, buccal, inhalation and injectable forms. This excipient is characterized by its high gastrointestinal absorption and permeability through the blood-brain barrier.5 Ethanol binds gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), thereby triggering a propapoptotic cascade in neurons and causing excitotoxicity.13,14 Although this association has not been completely confirmed, ethanol can cause long-lasting cognitive and behavioral defects in neonates. The reason is that neuronal differentiation, myelinization and migration are not fully developed during the neonatal period.13

Ethanol toxicity in patients younger than 6 is primarily caused by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) enzyme deficiency, which metabolizes ethanol into acetaldehyde, a metabolite with lower toxicity. In this population, ADH activity is <20% with respect to that in adults, resulting in the accumulation of acetaldehyde and ethanol.15–17 The chronic intake of ethanol –even at low doses– is contraindicated in children younger than 6 and is limited to a maximum period of two weeks in children older than 6.15 Pediatric patients with liver disease or receiving disulfiram or metronidazole have a higher risk of toxicity.16

Propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol

Propylene glycol is a multifunctional excipient used in a wide range of pediatric formulations, including oral, topic and injectable medications. Like in the case of ethanol, propylene glycol (PG) toxicity is caused by ADH and aldehyde dehydrogenase enzyme (ALDH) deficiency, which converts acetaldehyde into acetic acid, a non-toxic metabolite. The immaturity of this enzyme in infants younger than 4 contributes4,17,18 to a higher half-life of PG (10.8 to 30.5 h) as compared to adults (1.4 to 3.3 h).19,20 This long half-life favors the accumulation of toxic metabolites, thereby resulting in hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity,9,18 as detailed in Table 1. Additionally, when administered concomitantly with ethanol, the latter exhibits 10- to 20-fold higher affinity for ADH, thereby competitively inhibiting PG metabolism.13

Table 1.

Analysis of studies about common diluting and tensioactive agents and their associated adverse events in pediatric patients.

Author (year)  Excipient  Use  Reported toxic events  Dosage regimens recommended by regulatory agencies 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Valeur et al. (2018)19Cañete et al. (2018)4Yuliani et al. (2023)21Clouser et al. (2022)16EMA (2014)22FDA (2024)23European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG (2018)8  Ethanol  Co-solventsPreservatives  Central nervous system:agitation, disorientation, drowsiness, encephalopathy, headache, sedation, seizure and vertigo.Cardiovascular: hypotension and tachycardia.Gastrointestinal: gastric irritation, nausea and vomiting.Other: respiratory depression, hypoglycemia, hypothermia and topic hypersensitivity  EMAFrom 2 to 6 years: 6 mg/kg/dayChildren >6 years: 45 mg/kg/dayFDAChildren  <6 years: <0.5% v/vChildren from 2 to 12 years: 5%Children  >12 years: 10% 
Lim et al. (2014)18Valeur et al. (2018)19Akinmboni et al. (2018)24Belayneh et al. (2020)15Yuliani et al. (2023)21Clouser et al. (2022)16EMA (2017)25  PG  Co-solventsStabilizerPreservativePlasticizer  Cardiovascular decompensation: arrhythmias, hypotension and abnormal electroencephalogram.Central nervous system depression: seizure and hemorrhage.Gastrointestinal: reduced total transit time and laxative effects.Liver and kidneys: kidney failure and elevated levels of plasma creatinine and bilirubin.Other: hemolysis, serum hyperosmolarity, lactic acidosis, hypoglycemia, contact dermatitis, and irreversible deafness in pre-term infants.  EMAFrom 28 days to 44 weeks: 1 mg/kg/dayFrom 29 days to 4 years:50 mg/kg/dayFrom 5 years of age:500 mg/kg/day 
Debaja et al. (2023)26Hussain et al. (2019)27Yuliani et al. (2023)28Clouser et al. (2022)16  PEG  Co-solventHumectantLaxative  PEG: diarrhea, nephrotoxicity and dehydration.PEG 4000 and 3500
  • Neurological: seizures, speech disorders, hypotonia, sensory impairment, loss of consciousness and clonus.

  • Non-neurological: abdominal complaints, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal distension and exanthema.

 
Not established 
      PEG 2000 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis   
Rouaz et al. (2020)5Belayneh et al. (2020)15Malkawi et al. (2022)29Yuliani et al. (2023)28  Glycerin  Co-solventSweetenerPreservativeThickening agent  Concentration  >  40%: mucositis, diarrhea, electrolyte abnormalities, headache and gastrointestinal complaints  Not established 
Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria (2016)11  Peanut oil  Co-solvent  Hypersensitivity  Not established 
Malkawi et al. (2022)29Belayneh et al. (2020)15Kriegel et al. (2019)30Nagpal et al. (2016)31  Polisorbato 20 y 80  TensioactiveEmulsifiersHumectant  E-ferol syndrome: thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, hepatomegaly, cholestasis, ascites, hypotension and metabolic acidosis.Hepatotoxicity: at doses >80 mg/kg/day.Other: hypersensitivity and anaphylactic shock  Not established 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15  Carrageenan  TensioactiveHumectantSuspending agent  Possibly causes severe inflammatory reactions  Not established 

PG: Propylene glycol; PEG: Polyethylene glycol; EMA: European Medicines Agency; FDA: Food and Drug Administration.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350, 6000, 2000 and other agents with lower molecular weight are used as excipients in injectable and oral medications, suppositories and ointments. PEG 3350 and 4000 are used as active ingredients in colonoscopy bowel preparation medications and laxatives.32 In general terms, PEG is biologically inactive and has low oral bioavailability.16 However, evidence has been provided that PEG in cimetidine forms may extend gastric emptying time and compromise drug bioavailability. Moreover, PEG stearate induces the cytochrome-P450 enzyme, resulting in a reduced area under the curve of midazolam.33

Although the FDA approved PEG 3350 exclusively for patients older than 17 years for a period below 7 days, it is commonly found in preparations for pediatric patients. Long-term exposure could lead to low molecular weight compounds reaching toxic levels, as in the case of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol.26,34,35 Cases have been reported of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines containing the excipient PEG 2000.16,32

Glycerin or glycerol

Glycerin is used in a diversity of pediatric formulations, including laxatives, intravenous solutions and syrups. Glycerin is generally safe at low doses; however, at high concentrations (e.g. in laxatives or intravenous solutions), it may cause electrolyte and gastrointestinal abnormalities,5,15,29 especially in children with compromised kidney function. This excipient may also affect absorption in medications such as omeprazole and loperamide.5,15,17

Polysorbates

Polysorbates 20 and 80 are the most widely used tensioactive agents. Although the toxicokinetics of these substances are still not fully understood, they have been documented to inhibit glycoprotein P (P-gp) activity, which is an efflux pump. P-gp inhibition may influence drug bioavailability and distribution15,30; hence, careful dose adjustment and monitoring are needed in the absence of safe concentration thresholds for chronic exposure.

Table 1 details the most relevant solvents and tensioactive agents in terms of their associated adverse events in pediatric patients.

Low toxicity options

Lecithin –extracted from natural sources such as soya– acts as a biodegradable and biocompatible tensioactive agent. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that lecithin does not exhibit acute or chronic toxicity, nor developmental effects, even at high doses.28 As a very rare adverse event, its vegetal nature may cause allergic reactions in children with soya hypersensitivity.36

Preservatives and antioxidants

Preservatives are added to medications to prevent microorganism growth during manufacturing, storage or administration processes. The American Academy of Pediatrics does not recommend their use in children younger than 3 years due to their physiological and metabolic immaturity.5 On another note, its stability may be compromised by the presence of oxygen, a problem that is mitigated by the use of antioxidants.33 A description of the mechanisms of toxicity documented for some preservatives and antioxidants is provided in the following section.

Parabens

Methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, and butylparaben are the most common parabens in oral and parenteral pharmaceutical formulations. These excipients may disrupt the endocrine system and accumulate in tissues,37,38 exerting obesogenic effects39 by increasing the number and size of adipocytes; this increase is mediated by interference with adipose tissue transcriptional regulators, particularly via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs).40 Additionally, evidence has raised concerns that methyl- and propylparaben may interact with estrogen receptors. Hence, propylparaben may exhibit antiandrogenic activity13,17,41 and butylparaben may cause cellular toxicity.33 This group of excipients has been documented to disturb bilirubin and albumin binding; consequently, it should be avoided in patients with jaundice.15,29 Parabens may trigger cross-hypersensitivity reactions in aspirin-allergic individuals, owing to their structural similarity to hydroxyparabenzoic acid, a paraben metabolite.5,42 Potential genotoxic effects have also been described in in vitro studies,5 raising concerns that chronic exposure to low doses in children could increase the risk of cellular changes.38,40,42

Sodium benzoate

Sodium benzoate is used in multi-dose forms like syrups and oral solutions. This excipient is rapidly absorbed orally and is metabolized by the liver into benzoic acid, which conjugates with glycine to form hippuric acid, being primarily excreted in urine.43 In preterm neonates and infants younger than 4 weeks, the immaturity of glycine N-acyltransferase –an enzyme involved in the conjugation of sodium benzoate with glycine to produce hippuric acid– results in the accumulation of benzoic acid.5,17,44 This excipient may compete with bilirubin for binding sites on albumin and may trigger immediate non-immunological reactions, possibly mediated by a cholinergic mechanism.15,17 IgE- and histamine-mediated hypersensitivity reactions have been described, along with structural similarities to acetylsalicylic acid that may influence eicosanoid synthesis.16,43 Co-administration with ethanol or PG may impair hippuric acid excretion.13 At present, no safe concentration thresholds have been defined for chronic exposure in pediatric populations.

Benzyl alcohol

Benzyl alcohol is primarily used as a preservative and as a local analgesic and is added to injectable, topic and oral forms. The primary driver of its associated adverse events in neonates is the immaturity of benzyl alcohol metabolism.15 Excessive exposure to this excipient may overwhelm the detoxification capacity of the immature hepatic and renal systems due to deficient levels of glycine N-acyltransferase, an enzyme that converts benzoic acid into hippuric acid.15,24 Furthermore, this preservative has been shown to non-competitively inhibit ADH and ALDH, thereby promoting the accumulation of toxic metabolites when administered concomitantly with ethanol or PG.13 At present, any exposure to benzyl alcohol is contraindicated in children younger than 3 years5,45; additionally, no safe exposure thresholds have been defined for either acute or chronic use.

Sulfites and derivatives (bisulfite and metabisulfite)

Sulfites and their derivatives are widely used as antioxidants and preservatives in injectable solutions, liquid formulations, and other preparations in which protection against oxidation of labile drugs is required. In acidic environments or upon exposure to oxygen, sulfites decompose to sulfur dioxide (SO₂), an irritant gas with the potential to induce epithelial injury in the respiratory tract. Accordingly, pH control during formulation is essential to limit accelerated SO₂ release. Sulfur dioxide also stimulates cholinergic receptors within the respiratory tract46 and, in rare instances, metabisulfites may behave as haptens, eliciting IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions.47–49 Although evidence remains limited, sulfites may generate reactive oxygen species, such as sulfur-based peroxides, which could contribute to oxidative stress and damage to proteins and DNA.50,51 No safe thresholds for chronic exposure in pediatric populations have been established, and evidence on long-term pulmonary effects is very limited.

Table 2 presents the most relevant preservatives and antioxidants and their adverse effects in pediatric patients.

Table 2.

Summary of the most relevant preservatives and antioxidants and associated adverse effects in pediatric patients.

Author (year)  Excipient  Use  Reported toxic events  Dosage regimens recommended by regulatory agencies 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Moscoso-Ruiz et al. (2023)39Malkawi et al. (2022)29Petric (2021)42Bobillot et al. (2024)17Clouser et al. (2022)16Iacobelli et al. (2023)41Valeur et al. (2018)19EMA (2013)52  Parabens  Preservative  Hormonal adverse events: endocrine system disruption, possible estrogenic effects, reduction of spermatogeneis and serum testosterone levels.Other: hyperbilirubinemia (kernicterus), obesity, cross-hypersensitivity reactions, Anaphylactoid reactions and papulopustular rosacea  EMAPropylparaben: 2 mg/kg 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Bobillot et al. (2024)17Walczak-Nowicka et al. (2022)43Clouser et al. (2022)16  Sodium benzoate  Preservative  Elevated concentrations:atopic dermatitis, urticaria, allergy, anaphylactic shock, neurotoxicity, metabolic acidosis, and jaundice. Rare: cough and wheezing  Not established 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Akinmboni et al. (2018)24Clouser et al. (2022)16EMA (2017)53  Benzyl alcohol  PreservativeAnesthesic  At high concentrations:metabolic acidosis, respiratory depression, panting syndrome, renal failure, central nervous system depression, seizures and hypotension, hypersensitivity, intraventricular hemorrhage, kernicterus and contact dermatitis.  EMANeonates: contraindicatedIn infants older than 4 weeks: 5 mg/kg/day 
Yuliani et al. (2023)21Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Clouser et al. (2022)16  Benzalkonium chloride  Preservative  Respiratory damage:
  • Concentration  >  1%

Bronchoconstriction, respiratory arrest, nasal epithelial damage, and rhinitis. 
Not established 
      Topic damage:Ototoxicity, hypersensitivity and skin irritation   
Peiré (2019)54Rouaz et al. (2020)5Dórea (2017)55  Mercury compounds  Preservative  Hypersensitivity, allergy, erythema and vesicles  Not established 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Orlu et al. (2018)47  Sulfites  Preservatives antioxidant  Wheezing, dyspnea, chest tightness, dermatitis, hives, redness, hypotension, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and anaphylactic reactions.  Not established 
Peiré (2019)54Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Polaka et al. (2022)33  Propyl gallate  Antioxidant  Methemoglobinemia, dermatitis, pruritus and erythema.Rare: hyperactivity, asthma, neurological damage and possible cancer  Not established 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15  BHT and BHA  AntioxidantPreservative  Liver injury, acute gastroenteritis, and cyanosis  Not established 
Orlu et al. (2018)47Rowe et al. (2017)44  Thymol  Antioxidant  Respiratory arrest attributed to acute nasal congestion and edema.Do not use inhaled decongestants in children under 5 years of age  Not established 

BHA: butylated hydroxyanisole; BHT: butylated hydroxytoluene; EMA: European Medicines Agency; FDA

Low toxicity options

Potassium sorbate, a derivative of sorbic acid, is a widely used natural preservative. Several in vitro studies, adding its use in neonatal oral formulations, support its safety, with no evidence of significant toxicity or clinically relevant allergic reactions.56 Nevertheless, at concentrations exceeding the recommended daily intake (up to 3 mg/kg), cytotoxic and genotoxic effects have been described.57

Citric acid and sodium citrate, commonly employed as acidulants and buffering agents, have not been linked to serious adverse effects in neonates,17 although dental enamel erosion has been documented.58 Tocopherols (vitamin E), used as antioxidants, are considered safe, with no evidence of significant accumulation or systemic toxicity59; however, high-dose, long-term exposure –rare in excipient use– may impair coagulation via vitamin K antagonism.60

Sweeteners

Sweetening and coloring agents are indispensable components in the formulation of oral pediatric preparations, as they significantly enhance the flavor and color of the product, thereby ensuring acceptability.15 The following sections describe the documented mechanisms of toxicity and clinical considerations associated with prevalent sweeteners.

Sucrose

Sucrose is a disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose.61 Excessive or prolonged administration may cause dental damage and increase serum glucose concentrations. Unlike glucose, the hepatic metabolism of fructose promotes de novo lipogenesis, thereby contributing to childhood obesity.62 Emerging evidence suggests that, at high concentrations, fructose may be linked to the development or progression of certain malignancies. This is hypothesized to occur through the activation of various mechanistic pathways, including systemic inflammation.5,62 In children with fructosemia, enzyme aldolase B deficiency results in the intracellular accumulation of fructose-1-phosphate, causing nephrotoxicity.15

Aspartame

Aspartame is a synthetic dipeptide composed of aspartic acid and methylphenylalanine; the latter is toxic to patients with phenylketonuria and potentially hazardous for individuals with epileptogenic disorders.5,15 Aspartame is hydrolyzed and absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, releasing methanol, aspartic acid, and phenylalanine. Methanol is oxidized in the liver to formaldehyde and subsequently to formic acid. These compounds may damage hepatic cells and generate superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide, leading to protein denaturation and enzymatic changes.63 There are no conclusive studies regarding its safety during chronic exposure in childhood.

Saccharin

Saccharin is a non-caloric artificial sweetener derived from sulfonamide. No conclusive evidence has been provided of the carcinogenic potential of saccharin in humans. Some studies suggest a possible correlation with bladder cancer in children due to renal immaturity and the subsequent excessive accumulation of the sweetener; however, other authors, such as Debras et al.,64 find no evident connection between its consumption and cancer risk. Due to its sulfonamide structure, it may induce cross-reactivity in patients allergic to sulfonamides; this may result in dermatological reactions and cross-sensitivity with drugs within the sulfonamide group.15,61,65 Chronic consumption may reduce intestinal flora, promoting dysbiosis and insulin resistance.66,67

Sucralose

Sucralose is a sweetener synthesized from sucrose using thionyl chloride.61 Its absorption is minimal, and it is primarily excreted unchanged.15 This excipient increases the expression of P-glycoprotein and two cytochrome P450 isoforms. Consequently, it may alter the bioavailability of co-administered drugs. Furthermore, sucralose reduces the diversity of beneficial bacteria and promotes the growth of proinflammatory strains.68 Although it is a non-caloric excipient, it could influence levels of glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1.5,69 There are no conclusive studies regarding its safety during chronic exposure in childhood.

Sorbitol

Sorbitol is a sugar alcohol (polyol) characterized by limited gastrointestinal absorption. Within the intestinal lumen, this sweetener exerts an osmotic effect by attracting water, which leads to osmotic diarrhea. As a result, it may decrease the absorption of certain preparations, such as lamivudine.22 In the colon, unabsorbed sorbitol is fermented by the microbiota. This process generates gases, specifically H2 and CO2, along with short-chain fatty acids, resulting in abdominal distension.70 Children with aldolase B deficiency are unable to metabolize sorbitol, which is converted into fructose. This undesired effect leads to the accumulation of fructose-1-phosphate, causing severe metabolic complications.5,24,61 Currently, safe thresholds for long-term treatments have not been established. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence regarding how sorbitol affects the intestinal microbiota in healthy children.

Acesulfame potassium

Acesulfame potassium is a non-caloric artificial sweetener. Its thermal stability and resistance to extreme pH levels make it ideal for liquid and solid formulations. In vitro studies highlight its ability to promote the differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes, resulting in fat accumulation in children.71–74 Some studies suggest that early exposure could alter taste preferences toward sweet flavors. Additionally, it may reduce bacterial diversity67,72 and favor the growth of proinflammatory strains, although evidence for this microbial impact remains limited.67,75 Chronic consumption is believed to activate inflammatory pathways mediated by cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6.45,76 Acesulfame potassium is contraindicated in infants with sulfonamide allergies, due to its structural similarity to sulfonamides.77 Currently, there are no longitudinal studies regarding its safety during chronic exposure in childhood.

Table 3 describes the most relevant sweeteners and colorants for their potential adverse events in pediatric patients.

Table 3.

A review of studies on relevant sweeteners and colorants for their adverse events in pediatric patients.

Author (year)    Excipient  Reported toxic events  Dosage regimens recommended by regulatory agencies 
Gonzáles et al. (2021)78Malkawi et al. (2022)29Belayneh et al. (2020)15Epner et al. (2022)62AEMPS (2017)10  Sucrose  SweetenerDiluentBinderFilm formers  Decreased dental pH and subsequent degradation of acid-sensitive medications, enamel erosion, caries, obesity and fructose intolerance reactions  EMA5 mg/kg/day (patients with intolerance to fructose) 
Bobillot et al. (2024)17Malkawi et al. (2022)29Cuzzolin (2018)65Belayneh et al. (2020)15Baker-Smith et al. (2019)79Rouaz et al. (2020)5EMA (2017)8  Aspartame  Sweetener  Neurological: headache, seizures, neurotoxicity caused by phenylketonuria and panic attacks.Dermatological: allergy, angioedema and urticaria, vascular and granulomatous panniculitis, and cross-reaction with sulfonamides.Other: cardiovascular diseases, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, higher risk of early menarche (9 to 10 years) and thrombocytopenia  EMA40 mg/kg/day (do not apply to babies under 12 weeks of age) 
Bobillot et al. (2024)17Yuliani et al. (2023)21Cuzzolin (2018)65Belayneh et al. (2020)15  Saccharin  Sweetener  Dermatological: urticaria with pruritus and photosensitivity reactions.Other: hypertonia, insomnia, strabismus, opisthotonus, nausea and vomiting  Not established 
Yuliani et al. (2023)21Belayneh et al. (2020)15  Sucralose  Sweetener  Carcinogenicity and diabetes  Not established 
Bobillot et al. (2024)17Yuliani et al. (2023)21Malkawi et al. (2022)29Al Humaid (2018)61Clouser et al. (2022)16  Sorbitol  SweetenerHumectantPlasticizer StabilizerDiluent  Gastrointestinal: abdominal pain, tympanites, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, streptococcus reduction and carbohydrate malabsorption.Other: retinopathy, cataracts, and liver damage  European Excipient ReviewChildren from 0 to 2 years:5 mg/kgChildren older than 2 years: 140 mg/kg 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15  Peppermint oil  Sweetener  Atrial fibrillation, muscle pain, feeling of heartburn and gastrointestinal complaints  Not established 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Rouaz et al. (2020)5Orlu et al. (2018)47  Tartrazine  Colorant  FD&C yellow 5, FD&C yellow 6: Anaphylactic reactions, angioedema, asthma, urticaria, hyperkinesia, cross-sensitivity with acetylsalicylic acid, sodium benzoate, indomethacin and possible ADHD  Not established 
Orlu et al. (2018)47 Belayneh et al. (2020)15  Quinoline  Colorant  Contact dermatitis  Not established 
Peiré (2019)54Orlu et al. (2018)44  Xanthine  Colorant  Eosin: FD&C red 22: photosensitizerErythrosine: FD&C 3  =  E127: carcinogenicity  Not established 
Peiré (2019)54Belayneh et al. (2020)15Orlu et al. (2018)47  Triphenylmethane  Colorant  FD&C blue 1  =  E13: bronchoconstriction.FD&C green 3: skin rash similar to erythema multiforme.Fluorescein: FD&C yellow 7: anaphylaxis and angioedema  Not established 

EMA European Medicines Agency; TDAH: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Low toxicity options

Curcumin, when used either as an antioxidant or as a colorant, has demonstrated excellent tolerability in children with inflammatory diseases and epilepsy, with minimal adverse events, primarily mild tympanites, even at high doses of 4 g/day.80–83

Sulforaphane, a potent antioxidant derived from cruciferous vegetables, has demonstrated good tolerance in clinical studies involving children with autism spectrum disorder. No serious adverse effects were reported in these populations.84,85 Furthermore, a multicenter trial confirmed the safety of sulforaphane in children, although symptomatic benefits were moderate.84

Among polyalcohol sweeteners, xylitol and mannitol have established safety profiles in pediatrics. Xylitol is recognized for its dental benefits and minimal adverse events, including gastrointestinal discomfort such as excessive gas, loose stools, and diarrhea.47,86 Mannitol is a sugar alcohol (polyol) with an absorption rate of less than 20%, which confers it osmotic properties. Additionally, it accelerates intestinal transit, resulting in reduced bioavailability of co-administered drugs. Direct action on mast cells may trigger hypersensitivity reactions, although these effects are more frequent in patients with underlying allergies.5,15,33,87

Other excipientsLactose

Lactose is a disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose.61 Infants with lactose intolerance cannot correctly metabolize this disaccharide due to lactase deficiency, resulting in the accumulation of lactic acid, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.5,15,33 In children with galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase deficiency, galactose cannot be converted into glucose; as a result, unmetabolized galactose accumulates and leads to liver damage and cataracts.88 No maximum doses have been established for long-term treatments.

Cellulose derivatives, xanthan gum, and talc

Cellulose derivatives (microcrystalline cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, etc.) are vegetable polymers primarily used in tablets, capsules and suspensions. These derivatives exhibit low systemic absorption, leading to increased fecal volume and accelerated intestinal transit.17,89

Xanthan gum is a polysaccharide used in syrups, suspensions, and ophthalmic drops. At high doses, it is fermented by intestinal bacteria, generating gases and organic acids that cause gastrointestinal discomfort. Furthermore, its use is not recommended for infants under 12 weeks of age.90

Talc is a mineral (magnesium silicate) used in tablets, capsules, and powders. After inhalation, talc particles can settle in the lungs and cause respiratory complications. Additionally, the presence of hexachlorophene, an impurity in talc, can cause severe and irreversible neurotoxicity.42 At the same time, the presence of asbestos particles suggests an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women, although the evidence remains inconclusive.91 No information is available regarding safe thresholds for chronic oral exposure.

Phthalate

Phthalates are chemical compounds used primarily as plasticizers in tablet coatings, capsules, and controlled-release systems. They are also found in certain pharmaceutical packaging.92 Research has documented several risks associated with phthalate exposure: (i) These compounds cross the placenta to reach the umbilical cord and amniotic fluid, potentially impacting fetal development; (ii) high prenatal concentrations correlate with increased cortisol in female offspring and decreased levels in males. This likely occurs because phthalates interfere with the 11-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme responsible for cortisol inactivation. (iii) Additionally, the MBzP metabolite is associated with increased respiratory issues; (iv) phthalates can induce insulin resistance through oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment; and (v) they are also known to cause genital malformations.93 Safe maximum daily dosages remain undefined. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence concerning adult fertility outcomes after exposure during childhood.

Sodium salts

Sodium salts are included in formulations in several forms, including benzoate and citrate. High sodium intake is significant because it affects both blood pressure and homeostasis.17

Table 4 details the toxic effects reported for the discussed excipients as well as other additives.

Table 4.

Summary of studies on excipients with reported toxicity in pediatrics.

Author (year)  Excipient  Use  Reported toxic events 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Malkawi et al. (2022)29Rouaz et al. (2020)5Cañete et al. (2018)4  Lactose  Diluent  Symptoms of lactose intolerance: severe abdominal pain, tympanites, distension or bloating and diarrhea; joint pain and eczema; dehydration; jaundice, bacterial overgrowth and metabolic acidosis.In patients with galactosemia: liver failure, cataracts and possibly, mental retardation 
Belayneh et al. (2020)15Nagpal et al. (2016)31  Manitol  DiluentSweetenerPlasticizer  Diarrhea, impaired absorption of certain pharmaceuticals and hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions 
Malkawi et al. (2022)29Monteil et al. (2024)89  Cellulose derivatives  DiluentAdsorbentDisintegrants  Possible laxative effects 
Rouaz et al. (2020)5Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria (2016)11  Starch  DiluentBinderThickener  Gluten hypersensitivity; under humid conditions, aflatoxins (known to be carcinogenic) may develop. 
Bobillot et al. (2024)17  Xanthan gum  Gelling agent,StabilizerSuspensor  Possible gastrointestinal effects: laxative, diarrhea and tympanites. 
Polaka et al. (2022)33  Povidone  DisintegrantBinder  Possible anaphylactic reaction 
Rowe et al. (2017)44  Talc  DiluentGliding agentLubricant  When administered via intranasal or intravenous routes, talc can cause tissue granulomas, particularly in the lungs. Following inhalation, it may induce severe irritation and significant breathing difficulties. 
Rowe et al. (2017)44  Zinc stearate  Lubricant  Following inhalation, it has been associated with pneumonitis. Currently, it is rarely used. 
European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG (2018)8Clouser et al. (2022)16  Cyclodextrin  SolubilizerStabilizer  Diarrhea. Close monitoring is needed in patients with severe kidney failure, who should 
Rouaz et al. (2020)6Casale et al. (2023)93  Phthalate  Coating agent  This agent has been associated with abnormal fetal development, including cleft palate and skeletal malformations. 
Clouser et al. (2022)16  Arginine  Protein stabilizer  In arginase-deficient patients, this agent may cause ammonia accumulation, hyperammonemia, vomiting, poor growth, seizures, lethargy, developmental delays, and coma. 
European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG (2018)8  Boric acid and derivatives  BufferPreservative  The presence of boron may affect fertility in children.Sodium borate: vomiting, diarrhea, erythema, central nervous system depression, and kidney damage 
European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG (2018)8  Formaldehyde  Preservative  Contact dermatitis, gastric complaints and diarrhea 
Orlu et al. (2018)47  Menthol  Therapeuticflavoring  Hypersensitivity, systemic allergies, laryngeal spasms, apnea and abrupt fainting. Rare: Excessive inhalation or oral exposure may cause central nervous system or gastrointestinal disorders. 
Orlu et al. (2018)47  Paraffin  Ointment-based  Lipoid pneumonia caused by aspiration or use of ophthalmic preparations 
Rowe et al. (2017)44  Mineral oil  LubricantCo-solvent  It affects appetite, interfers vitamin absorption and may cause granulomatous reactions. Post-injection: vasospasm and lipoid pneumonia 
Discussion

Current debate surrounding excipients in pediatric formulations emphasizes the need to carefully evaluate all additives used in pharmaceuticals for this population. Despite the evidence available, pharmaceuticals designed for adults continue to be administered to pediatric patients owing to the persistent shortage of specific formulations for children. Furthermore, during the development of pediatric formulations, a detailed analysis of excipients is often overlooked, focusing primarily on drug dosage and the organoleptic properties of the product. Consequently, pediatric patients are exposed to pharmaceuticals that were not specifically designed, developed or evaluated for pediatric patients.

The scientific community has shown limited –and even contradictory– interest in demonstrating the risks associated with the use of excipients in pediatric patients. Currently, the European Pediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI), in collaboration with the US Pediatric Formulation Initiative (US PFI), has joined efforts to develop a database named STEP (Safety and Toxicity of Excipients for Pediatrics). In parallel, the European study of neonatal excipient exposure (ESNEE) has designed different methods for a comprehensive evaluation of neonatal exposure to potentially toxic agents in pharmaceuticals.15 In 2018, the European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG published an appendix titled Excipients in the labelling and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use (SANTE-2017-11,668)8 that addressed the toxicity of 53 excipients in the pediatric population. Although the list of excipients evaluated includes some of the most widely used excipients, it is still very limited, considering the vast amount of excipients currently used by the industry.

The goal of pursuing improved transparency in the use of excipients is not preventing their use, but ensuring that excipients are added to formulations at safe concentrations. This approach aligns with Paracelso's statement: “All substances are inherently toxic. It is solely the dosage that determines whether a substance remains harmless or becomes toxic to a biological system”. This review uncovers that the vast majority of reported toxicity events were caused by overexposure to and long-term use of the additive. A very limited number of specific dosage regimes have been established by the EMA, FDA and other regulatory agencies for the pediatric population. Notably, some authors such as Cañete et al. (2018),4 Rowe et al.(2017),44 Belayneh et al.15 and Bobillot et al.17 provide more detailed dosing guidance for a broader range of excipients. However, these limits are generally based on acceptable daily intakes, are not specifically tailored to pediatric populations, and are primarily intended for food rather than pharmaceutical applications.

As outlined above, although dose and duration of exposure are key considerations, they do not constitute the sole considerations. The concern lies not only in individual excipients but also in their combined effects. Given that medicinal products typically contain more than one excipient, pediatric patients are exposed to combinations of substances, highlighting both the complexity of the problem and the paucity of data regarding cross-interactions and excipient toxicokinetics.

Organisms undoubtedly respond differently to the presence of excipients. Factors such as diseases, biological maturity, age, and pharmacological treatments, to name a few, are involved in the development of undesired events. It is at this point where professionals should act. In the context of increasing competition within the pharmaceutical industry, labeling regulations in countries such as Spain are of particular interest, as they require the disclosure of all excipients contained in medicinal products, including those with known pharmacological effects.94 This approach constitutes a substantial step forward in facilitating the assessment of complete product composition and reducing the risk of potential toxicity.

In parallel, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of novel drug delivery systems specifically designed for pediatric populations. The aim of these initiatives is to enhance therapeutic efficacy, acceptability, and ease of administration, while mitigating the potential adverse effects linked to excessive excipient exposure.95 Notable approaches include multiparticulate drug delivery systems95,96; orodispersible tablets and films.5,95 Furthermore, multifunctional excipient vehicles devoid of solvents, preservatives, sweeteners, and colorants –such as Ora Plus®, Ora Sweet® SF, SyrSpend SF PH4®, SyrSpend Alka®, and Unispend Anhydrous®,97,98 among others– have been introduced. In Latin America, advances in pediatric formulations have been limited by high costs and the lack of manufacturing facilities for the production of pediatric formulations. Of note, initiatives such as the Official Mexican Standard NOM-177-SSA1–20132 seek to improve the quality and safety of pediatric formulations. However, there is a long journey ahead in terms of innovation and accessibility.

The primary aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the use of excipients in pediatric formulations, placing the focus on safety according to the available toxicology studies.

Our results highlight the heterogeneity of the toxicological information currently available about pediatric excipients. Hence, there is a substantial gap in knowledge of their effects in neonates and infants, especially in terms of exposure thresholds, prolonged-use safety and interaction among multiple additives. Mechanisms of toxicity are thoroughly documented for several excipients, including hepatic, renal, neurological, and endocrine effects, and their impact related to metabolic immaturity. However, specific dosage parameters have not been established by regulatory agencies. This study reveals that a high proportion of the reported adverse events are related to high concentrations or prolonged use, which underlines the urge to define more consistent pediatric criteria.

Contribution to the scientific literature

This study integrates recent toxicological, clinical and regulatory evidence and categorizes 54 excipients by their function, risks and gaps of knowledge. The resulting classification provides a structured overview of the current landscape and enables the identification of critical areas where evidence remains limited, particularly in neonates and infants.

Synthesized information favors the use of more solid criteria to assess the safety of excipients in pediatric formulations. Additionally, the information provided facilitates appropriate excipient choice, improves therapeutic and dispensing decision-making, and guides the development of safer master formulations. The information provides a practical foundation for enhancing risk assessment processes and developing institutional guidelines focused on pediatric safety.

Authorship

All authors contributed significantly to this work. Leonel Silva-Chocoteco and Monserratt Abud-González contributed to study conception and design, literature search and study selection. Cesar Ricardo Cortez-Álvarez and Nicte Selene Fajardo-Robledo contributed to draft writing and performed a critical review of its content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for publication.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

References
[1]
V.R. van Cuilenborg, J. Hermanides, E.M.E. Bos, et al.
Perioperative approach of allergic patients.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 35 (2021), pp. 11-25
[2]
NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-177-SSA1-2013,.
que establece las pruebas y procedimientos para demostrar que un medicamento es intercambiable.
Diario Oficial de la Federación, (2013),
[3]
L. Kerlin Roy, Xiantang Li.
Chapter 24 – Pathology in non-clinical drug safety assessment.
Haschek and Rousseaux's Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology, 3a ed., pp. 725-750
[4]
C. Cañete, M. Garcia, B. Garcia, M.J. Cabañas.
Formulación magistral y excipientes en pediatría.
El Farmacéut Hosp, 213 (2018), pp. 22-28
[5]
K. Rouaz, B. Chiclana-Rodríguez, A. Nardi-Ricart, et al.
Excipients in the pediatric population: a review.
Pharmaceutics, 13 (2021), pp. 387
[6]
Committee for medicinal products for human use, pediatric committee. Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for pediatric use, European Medicines Agency (EMA), (2013),
[7]
A. Tricco, E. Lillie, W. Zarin, et al.
PRISMA extensionfor scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.
Ann Intern Med, 169 (2018), pp. 467-485
[8]
European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG.
Annex to the European Commission guideline on ‘Excipients in the labelling and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use’ (SANTE-2017-11668).
[9]
Food and Drug Administration.
Guidance for industry nonclinical studies for the safety evaluation of pharmaceutical excipients.
Food and Drug Administration, (2005),
[10]
Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS).
Actualización de la información sobre excipientes en la información de medicamentos.
Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social y Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, (2018),
[11]
Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria.
Recomendación de seguridad generalizable «Reacciones adversas relacionadas con los excipientes».
1a ed., Servicio Madrileño de Salud, (2016),
[12]
J. van der Merwe, J. Steenekamp, D. Steyn, J. Hamman.
The role of functional excipients in solid oral dosage forms to overcome poor drug dissolution and bioavailability.
Pharmaceutics, 12 (2020), pp. 393
[13]
G. Nellis.
The use of excipients in medicines administered to neonates in Europe.
1a ed., University of Tartu Press, (2017),
[14]
A.S. de Leon, P. Tadi.
Biochemistry, gamma aminobutyric acid.
Statpearls Publishing, (2024),
[15]
A. Belayneh, E. Tadese, F. Molla.
Safety and biopharmaceutical challenges of excipients in off-label pediatric formulations.
Int J Gen Med, 13 (2020), pp. 1051-1066
[16]
A. Clouser, E. Diseroad.
Harmful excipients for pediatric patients.
Contemp Pediatr, 39 (2022), pp. 26-31
[17]
M. Bobillot, V. Delannoy, A. Trouillard, J.M. Kinowski, N.M. Sanchez-Ballester, I. Soulairol.
Potentially harmful excipients: state of the art for oral liquid forms used in neonatology and pediatrics units.
Pharmaceutics, 16 (2024), pp. 119
[18]
T.Y. Lim, R.L. Poole, N.M. Pageler.
Propylene glycol toxicity in children.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther, 19 (2014), pp. 277-282
[19]
K.S. Valeur, H. Holst, K. Allegaert.
Excipients in neonatal medicinal products: never prescribed, commonly administered.
Pharmaceut Med, 32 (2018), pp. 251-258
[20]
R.F. De Cock, C.A. Knibbe, A. Kulo, et al.
Developmental pharmacokinetics of propylene glycol in preterm and term neonates.
Br J Clin Pharmacol, 75 (2013), pp. 162-171
[21]
S.H. Yuliani, D.C.A. Putri, D.M. Virginia, M.R. Gani, F.D.O. Riswanto.
Prevalence, risk, and challenges of extemporaneous preparation for pediatric patients in developing nations: a review.
Pharmaceutics, 15 (2023), pp. 840
[22]
European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Questions and answers on ethanol in the context of the revision of the guideline on ‘excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use’ (CPMP/463/00).
[23]
Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
21 CFR Part 328 – PART 328—over- the-counter drug products intended for oral ingestion that contain alcohol.
Food and Drug Administration and Department of Health and Human Services, (2024),
[24]
T.O. Akinmboni, N.L. Davis, A.J. Falck, C.F. Bearer, S.M. Mooney.
Excipient exposure in very low birth weight preterm neonates.
J Perinatol, 38 (2018), pp. 169-174
[25]
European Medicines Agency.
Questions and answers on propylene glycol used as an excipient in medicinal products for human use.
[26]
A. Dabaja, A. Dabaja, M. Abbas.
Polyethylene glycol.
StatPearls,
[27]
S.Z. Hussain, J. Belkind-Gerson, A. Chogle, H.O.M.B.R.E. Bhuiyan, T. Hicks, S. Misra.
Probable neuropsychiatric toxicity of polyethylene glycol: roles of media, internet and the caregivers.
GastroHep, 1 (2019), pp. 118-123
[28]
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food), A. Mortensen, F. Aguilar, et al.
Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of lecithins (E 322) as a food additive.
EFSA J, 15 (2017), pp. 4742
[29]
W.A. Malkawi, E. AlRafayah, M. AlHazabreh, S. AbuLaila, A.M. Al-Ghananeem.
Formulation challenges and strategies to develop pediatric dosage forms.
[30]
C. Kriegel, M. Festag, R.S.K. Kishore, D. Roethlisberger, G. Schmitt.
Pediatric safety of polysorbates in drug formulations.
Children (Basel), 7 (2019), pp. 1
[31]
N. Nagpal, P. Kaur, R. Kumar, S. Rahar, R. Dhawan, M. Arora.
Pharmaceutical diluents and their unwanted effects: a review.
Bull Pharm Res, 6 (2016), pp. 45-49
[32]
A. Bianchi, P. Bottau, E. Calamelli, et al.
Hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycol in adults and children: an emerging challenge.
[33]
S. Polaka, S.S. Gomte, V. Pandey, et al.
Pharmaceutical excipients: special focus on adverse interactions.
Pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetic considerations, pp. 513-542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98,367-9.00009-3
[34]
K.C. Williams, L.K. Rogers, I. Hill, J. Barnard, C. Di Lorenzo.
PEG 3350 administration is not associated with sustained elevation of glycol levels.
J Pediatr, 195 (2018), pp. 148-153.e1
[35]
C.S. Louis.
Scrutiny for laxatives as a childhood remedy.
The New York Times, (2024),
[36]
Y. Gholmie, A.C. Lozinsky, H. Godwin, et al.
Tolerance of soya lecithin in children with non-immunoglobulin E-mediated soya allergy: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.
J Hum Nutr Diet, 33 (2020), pp. 232-240
[37]
A. Karwacka, D. Zamkowska, M. Radwan, J. Jurewicz.
Exposure to modern, widespread environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and their effect on the reproductive potential of women: an overview of current epidemiological evidence.
Hum Fertil, 22 (2019), pp. 2-25
[38]
K. Nowak, W. Ratajczak-Wrona, M. Górska, E. Jabłońska.
Parabens and their effects on the endocrine system.
Mol Cell Endocrinol, 474 (2018), pp. 238-251
[39]
I. Moscoso-Ruiz, Y. Gálvez-Ontiveros, C. Samaniego-Sánchez, et al.
Presence of parabens in different children biological matrices and its relationship with body mass index.
Nutrients, 15 (2023), pp. 1154
[40]
P.D. Darbre.
Endocrine disruptors and obesity.
Curr Obes Rep, 6 (2017), pp. 18-27
[41]
S. Iacobelli, M. Commins, S. Lorrain, et al.
Paraben exposure through drugs in the neonatal intensive care unit: a regional cohort study.
[42]
Z. Petric, J. Ružić, I. Žuntar.
The controversies of parabens – an overview nowadays.
Acta Pharm, 71 (2021), pp. 17-32
[43]
Ł.J. Walczak-Nowicka, M. Herbet.
Sodium benzoate-harmfulness and potential use in therapies for disorders related to the nervous system: a review.
Nutrients, 14 (2022), pp. 1497
[44]
R. Rowe, P. Shesckey, M. Quinn.
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients.
8a ed., Pharmaceutical Press, (2017),
[45]
M.B. de A. Antunes Pinto.
Excipients in neonatology: technological and safety issues.
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, (2021),
[46]
S. Jiang, H. Chen, P. Shen, et al.
Gasotransmitter research advances in respiratory diseases.
Antioxid Redox Signal, 40 (2024), pp. 168-185
[47]
Orlu M, Salunke S, Tuleu C. Pediatric pharmaceutics—the science of formulating medicines for children. En: Tovey GD, editor. Pharmaceutical formulation: the science and technology of dosage forms. 1a ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2018. 258–287.
[48]
F.-D. Popescu, M. Jutel, S. Smolinska.
Classification of non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to foods: an up-to-date approach focused on mechanisms.
[49]
R.K. Bush, S.L. Taylor.
Reactions to food and drug additives.
Med Agric Food Sci, 2 (2014), pp. 1340-1356
[50]
M. Oshimo, F. Nakashima, K. Kai, H. Matsui, T. Shibata, M. Akagawa.
Sodium sulfite causes gastric mucosal cell death by inducing oxidative stress.
Free Radic Res, 55 (2021), pp. 731-743
[51]
M. Velayutham, C.F. Hemann, A.J. Cardounel, J.L. Zweier.
Sulfite oxidase activity of cytochrome c: role of hydrogen peroxide.
Biochem Biophys Rep, 5 (2016), pp. 96-104
[52]
European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Reflection paper on the use of methyl- and propylparaben as excipients in human medicinal products for oral use.
[53]
European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Questions and answers on benzoic acid and benzoates used as excipients in medicinal products for human use.
[54]
M.A.G. Peiré.
Farmacología Pediátrica.
1a ed., Buenos Aires, (2019),
[55]
J.G. Dórea.
Low-dose thimerosal in pediatric vaccines: adverse effects in perspective.
Environ Res, 152 (2017), pp. 280-293
[56]
Oro Agri Incorporated.
Petition to add potassium sorbate to § 205.601 € and § 205.601 (i) of the national list.
[57]
F.S. Zouaoui, R. Boukhari, N. Heroual, et al.
Estimation of dietary exposure to sodium benzoate (e211) and potassium sorbate (e202) of children and adolescents in the Oran region, Algeria.
[58]
A.C. Valinoti, L.C. da Costa Jr., A. Farah, V. Pereira de Sousa, A. Fonseca-Gonçalves, L.C. Maia.
Are pediatric antibiotic formulations potentials risk factors for dental caries and dental erosion?.
Open Dent J, 10 (2016), pp. 420-430
[59]
EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food).
Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of tocopherol-rich extract (E 306), α-tocopherol (E 307), γ-tocopherol (E 308) and δ-tocopherol (E 309) as food additives.
EFSA J, 13 (2015), pp. 4247
[60]
K.N. Owen, O. Dewald.
Vitamin E toxicity.
StatPearls Publishing, (2023),
[61]
Humaid J. Al.
Sweetener content and cariogenic potential of pediatric oral medications: a literature.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim), 12 (2018), pp. 75-82
[62]
M. Epner, P. Yang, R.W. Wagner, L. Cohen.
Understanding the link between sugar and cancer: an examination of the preclinical and clinical evidence.
Cancers (Basel), 14 (2022), pp. 6042
[63]
K. Czarnecka, A. Pilarz, A. Rogut, et al.
Aspartame-true or false? Narrative review of safety analysis of general use in products.
Nutrients, 13 (2021), pp. 1957
[64]
C. Debras, E. Chazelas, B. Srour, et al.
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study.
[65]
L. Cuzzolin.
Neonates exposed to excipients: concern about safety.
J Pediatr Neonat Individual Med, 7 (2018),
[66]
E. Posta, I. Fekete, E. Gyarmati, L. Stündl, E. Zold, Z. Barta.
The effects of artificial sweeteners on intestinal nutrient-sensing receptors: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde?.
Life (Basel), 14 (2023), pp. 10
[67]
A. Conz, M. Salmona, L. Diomede.
Effect of non-nutritive sweeteners on the gut microbiota.
Nutrients, 15 (2023), pp. 1869
[68]
S. Del Pozo, S. Gómez-Martínez, L.E. Díaz, E. Nova, R. Urrialde, A. Marcos.
Potential effects of sucralose and saccharin on gut microbiota: a review.
Nutrients, 14 (2022), pp. 1682
[69]
M.J. Tsai, C.H. Li, H.T. Wu, et al.
Long-term consumption of sucralose induces hepatic insulin resistance through an extracellular signal-regulated kinase ½-dependent pathway.
Nutrients, 15 (2023), pp. 2814
[70]
Y.Y. Chu, Y.S.H. Yang, S.Y. Hsu, et al.
Gut microbiome and body composition with sorbitol intake during early lifespan.
[71]
B.R. Simon, S.D. Parlee, B.S. Learman, et al.
Artificial sweeteners stimulate adipogenesis and suppress lipolysis independently of sweet taste receptors.
J Biol Chem, 288 (2013), pp. 32475-32489
[72]
Y.Y. Chu, Y.S.H. Yang, S.Y. Hsu, et al.
Gut microbiome and body composition with sorbitol intake during early lifespan.
[73]
P.E. Bridge-Comer, M.H. Vickers, C.M. Reynolds.
Intake of the artificial sweetener acesulfame-potassium alone and in combination with a high-fat diet leads to differential and sex-specific effects on metabolic function in mice.
[74]
M.J. Tsai, C.H. Li, H.T. Wu, et al.
Long- term consumption of sucralose induces hepatic insulin resistance through an extracellular signal-regulated kinase ½-dependent pathway.
Nutrients, 15 (2023), pp. 2814
[75]
A.R. Basson, A. Rodriguez-Palacios, F. Cominelli.
Artificial sweeteners: history and new concepts on inflammation.
[76]
S. Durán Agüero, L. Angarita Dávila, M.C. Escobar Contreras, D. Rojas Gómez, J. de Assis Costa.
Noncaloric sweeteners in children: a controversial theme.
Biomed Res Int, 2018 (2018),
[77]
S.J. Stohs, M.J. Miller.
A case study involving allergic reactions to sulfur-containing compounds including, sulfite, taurine, acesulfame potassium and sulfonamides.
Food Chem Toxicol, 63 (2014), pp. 240-243
[78]
L. González, M.C. Dávila.
2021 vol. 1 Boletín farmacotecnia, formulas orales líquidas.
1a ed., Grupo de Farmacotecnia de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, (2021),
[79]
C.M. Baker-Smith, S.D. de Ferranti, W.J. Cochran, Committee on Nutrition, Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
The use of nonnutritive sweeteners in children.
[80]
Z. Heidari, M. Daei, M. Boozari, T. Jamialahmadi, A. Sahebkar.
Curcumin supplementation in pediatric patients: a systematic review of current clinical evidence.
Phytother Res, 36 (2022), pp. 1442-1458
[81]
K. Lis, Z. Bartuzi.
Plant food dyes with antioxidant properties and allergies-friend or enemy?.
Antioxidants (Basel), 12 (2023), pp. 1357
[82]
D.L. Suskind, G. Wahbeh, T. Burpee, M. Cohen, D. Christie, W. Weber.
Tolerability of curcumin in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a forced-dose titration study.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 56 (2013), pp. 277-279
[83]
A. Eghbali, M. Adibifar, A. Ghasemi, et al.
The effect of oral curcumin on vincristine-induced neuropathy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
[84]
A.W. Zimmerman, K. Singh, S.L. Connors, et al.
Randomized controlled trial of sulforaphane and metabolite discovery in children with autism spectrum disorder [published correction appears in Mol Autism. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00451-9.].
[85]
G. McGuinness, Y. Kim.
Sulforaphane treatment for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.
EXCLI J, 19 (2020), pp. 892-903
[86]
A. Gasmi Benahmed, A. Gasmi, M. Arshad, et al.
Health benefits of xylitol.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 104 (2020), pp. 7225-7237
[87]
S. Tenny, R. Patel, W. Thorell.
Mannitol.
StatPearls Publishing, (2024),
[88]
G.T. Berry.
Classic galactosemia and clinical variant galactosemia,
[89]
M. Monteil, M.N. Sanchez-Ballester, J.M. Devoisselle, S. Begu, I. Soulairol.
Regulations on excipients used in 3D printing of pediatric oral forms.
[90]
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), A. Mortensen, F. Aguilar, et al.
Re-evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive.
[91]
T.H. Tran, J.E. Steffen, K.M. Clancy, T. Bird, D.S. Egilman.
Talc, asbestos, and epidemiology: corporate influence and scientific incognizance.
Epidemiology, 30 (2019), pp. 783-788
[92]
B.Y. Chung, S.M. Choi, T.H. Roh, et al.
Risk assessment of phthalates in pharmaceuticals.
J Toxicol Environ Health A, 82 (2019), pp. 351-360
[93]
J. Casale, A.S. Rice.
Phthalates toxicity.
StatPearls Publishing, (2024),
[94]
Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS).
Información sobre excipientes en ficha técnica, prospecto y etiquetado de medicamentos.
Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS) y Ministerio de Sanidad, (2024),
[95]
S. Kole, A. Kuchekar, D. Limaye.
Advancements in formulation approaches to pediatric oral drug delivery systems.
HUJPHARM, 41 (2021), pp. 254-265
[96]
F.L. Lopez, T.B. Ernest, C. Tuleu, M.O. Gul.
Formulation approaches to pediatric oral drug delivery: benefits and limitations of current platforms.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 12 (2015), pp. 1727-1740
[97]
M. García, C. Cañete.
Vehículos en formulaciones orales líquidas para pacientes pediátricos.
SEFH, 4 (2014), pp. 1-6
[98]
K. Cutaia, L. Chablani, F. Zhao.
Basics of compounding: vehicles for compounded oral liquid medications: a review.
Int J Pharm Compd, 22 (2018), pp. 480-489
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Farmacia Hospitalaria
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas